Source: http://www.nytimes.com, youtube.com
Transcript of Bill Clinton’s Speech to the Democratic National Convention
The following is the full text of former President Bill Clinton’s speech on Wednesday from the Democratic National Convention.
PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON: Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you.
(Sustained cheers, applause.) Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank
you.
Now, Mr. Mayor, fellow Democrats, we are here to nominate a president.
(Cheers, applause.) And I’ve got one in mind. (Cheers, applause.)
I want to nominate a man whose own life has known its fair share of
adversity and uncertainty. I want to nominate a man who ran for
president to change the course of an already weak economy and then just
six weeks before his election, saw it suffer the biggest collapse since
the Great Depression; a man who stopped the slide into depression and
put us on the long road to recovery, knowing all the while that no
matter how many jobs that he saved or created, there’d still be millions
more waiting, worried about feeding their own kids, trying to keep
their hopes alive.
I want to nominate a man who’s cool on the outside — (cheers, applause) —
but who burns for America on the inside. (Cheers, applause.)
I want — I want a man who believes with no doubt that we can build a new
American Dream economy, driven by innovation and creativity, but
education and — yes — by cooperation. (Cheers.)
And by the way, after last night, I want a man who had the good sense to marry Michelle Obama. (Cheers, applause.)
You know — (cheers, applause). I — (cheers, applause).
I want — I want Barack Obama to be the next president of the United
States. (Cheers, applause.) And I proudly nominate him to be the
standard-bearer of the Democratic Party.
Now, folks, in Tampa a few days ago, we heard a lot of talk — (laughter)
— all about how the president and the Democrats don’t really believe in
free enterprise and individual initiative, how we want everybody to be
dependent on the government, how bad we are for the economy.
This Republican narrative — this alternative universe — (laughter,
applause) — says that every one of us in this room who amounts to
anything, we’re all completely self-made. One of the greatest chairmen
the Democratic Party ever had, Bob Strauss — (cheers, applause) — used
to say that ever politician wants every voter to believe he was born in a
log cabin he built himself. (Laughter, applause.) But, as Strauss then
admitted, it ain’t so. (Laughter.)
We Democrats — we think the country works better with a strong middle
class, with real opportunities for poor folks to work their way into it —
(cheers, applause) — with a relentless focus on the future, with
business and government actually working together to promote growth and
broadly share prosperity. You see, we believe that “we’re all in this
together” is a far better philosophy than “you’re on your own.” (Cheers,
applause.) It is.
So who’s right? (Cheers.) Well, since 1961, for 52 years now, the
Republicans have held the White House 28 years, the Democrats, 24. In
those 52 years, our private economy has produced 66 million private
sector jobs.
So what’s the job score? Republicans, 24 million; Democrats, 42 (million). (Cheers, applause.)
Now, there’s — (cheers, applause) — there’s a reason for this. It turns
out that advancing equal opportunity and economic empowerment is both
morally right and good economics. (Cheers, applause.) Why? Because
poverty, discrimination and ignorance restrict growth. (Cheers,
applause.) When you stifle human potential, when you don’t invest in new
ideas, it doesn’t just cut off the people who are affected; it hurts us
all. (Cheers, applause.) We know that investments in education and
infrastructure and scientific and technological research increase
growth. They increase good jobs, and they create new wealth for all the
rest of us. (Cheers, applause.)
Now, there’s something I’ve noticed lately. You probably have too. And
it’s this. Maybe just because I grew up in a different time, but though I
often disagree with Republicans, I actually never learned to hate them
the way the far right that now controls their party seems to hate our
president and a lot of other Democrats. I — (cheers, applause) — that
would be impossible for me because President Eisenhower sent federal
troops to my home state to integrate Little Rock Central High School.
(Cheers, applause.) President Eisenhower built the interstate highway
system.
When I was a governor, I worked with President Reagan and his White
House on the first round of welfare reform and with President George
H.W. Bush on national education goals.
(Cheers, applause.) I’m actually very grateful to — if you saw from the
film what I do today, I have to be grateful, and you should be, too —
that President George W. Bush supported PEPFAR. It saved the lives of
millions of people in poor countries. (Cheers, applause.)
And I have been honored to work with both Presidents Bush on natural
disasters in the aftermath of the South Asian tsunami, Hurricane
Katrina, the horrible earthquake in Haiti. Through my foundation, both
in America and around the world, I’m working all the time with
Democrats, Republicans and independents. Sometimes I couldn’t tell you
for the life who I’m working with because we focus on solving problems
and seizing opportunities and not fighting all the time. (Cheers,
applause.)
And so here’s what I want to say to you, and here’s what I want the
people at home to think about. When times are tough and people are
frustrated and angry and hurting and uncertain, the politics of constant
conflict may be good. But what is good politics does not necessarily
work in the real world. What works in the real world is cooperation.
(Cheers, applause.) What works in the real world is cooperation,
business and government, foundations and universities.
Ask the mayors who are here. (Cheers, applause.) Los Angeles is getting
green and Chicago is getting an infrastructure bank because Republicans
and Democrats are working together to get it. (Cheers, applause.) They
didn’t check their brains at the door. They didn’t stop disagreeing, but
their purpose was to get something done.
Now, why is this true? Why does cooperation work better than constant conflict?
Because nobody’s right all the time, and a broken clock is right twice a day. (Cheers, applause.)
And every one of us — every one of us and every one of them, we’re
compelled to spend our fleeting lives between those two extremes,
knowing we’re never going to be right all the time and hoping we’re
right more than twice a day. (Laughter.)
Unfortunately, the faction that now dominates the Republican Party
doesn’t see it that way. They think government is always the enemy,
they’re always right, and compromise is weakness. (Boos.) Just in the
last couple of elections, they defeated two distinguished Republican
senators because they dared to cooperate with Democrats on issues
important to the future of the country, even national security.
(Applause.)
They beat a Republican congressman with almost a hundred percent voting
record on every conservative score, because he said he realized he did
not have to hate the president to disagree with him. Boy, that was a
nonstarter, and they threw him out. (Laughter, applause.)
One of the main reasons we ought to re-elect President Obama is that he
is still committed to constructive cooperation. (Cheers, applause.) Look
at his record. Look at his record. (Cheers, applause.) Look at his
record. He appointed Republican secretaries of defense, the Army and
transportation. He appointed a vice president who ran against him in
2008. (Laughter, applause.) And he trusted that vice president to
oversee the successful end of the war in Iraq and the implementation of
the recovery act. (Cheers, applause.)
And Joe Biden — Joe Biden did a great job with both. (Sustained cheers, applause.)
He — (sustained cheers, applause) — President Obama — President Obama
appointed several members of his Cabinet even though they supported
Hillary in the primary. (Applause.) Heck, he even appointed Hillary.
(Cheers, applause.)
Wait a minute. I am — (sustained cheers, applause) — I am very proud of
her. I am proud of the job she and the national security team have done
for America. (Cheers, applause.) I am grateful that they have worked
together to make us safer and stronger, to build a world with more
partners and fewer enemies. I’m grateful for the relationship of respect
and partnership she and the president have enjoyed and the signal that
sends to the rest of the world, that democracy does not have a blood —
have to be a blood sport, it can be an honorable enterprise that
advances the public interest. (Cheers, applause.)
Now — (sustained cheers, applause) — besides the national security team,
I am very grateful to the men and women who’ve served our country in
uniform through these perilous times. (Cheers, applause.) And I am
especially grateful to Michelle Obama and to Joe Biden for supporting
those military families while their loved ones were overseas — (cheers,
applause) — and for supporting our veterans when they came home, when
they came home bearing the wounds of war or needing help to find
education or jobs or housing.
President Obama’s whole record on national security is a tribute to his
strength, to his judgment and to his preference for inclusion and
partnership over partisanship. We need more if it in Washington, D.C.
(Cheers, applause.)
Now, we all know that he also tried to work with congressional
Republicans on health care, debt reduction and new jobs. And that didn’t
work out so well. (Laughter.) But it could have been because, as the
Senate Republican leader said in a remarkable moment of candor two full
years before the election, their number one priority was not to put
America back to work; it was to put the president out of work. (Mixed
cheers and boos, applause.) (Chuckles.) Well, wait a minute. Senator, I
hate to break it to you, but we’re going to keep President Obama on the
job. (Cheers, applause.)
Now, are you ready for that? (Cheers, applause.) Are you willing to work for it. Oh, wait a minute.
AUDIENCE MEMBERS: (Chanting.) Four more years! Four more years! Four more years! Four more years!
PRESIDENT CLINTON: In Tampa —
AUDIENCE MEMBERS: (Chanting.) Four more years! Four more years!
PRESIDENT CLINTON: In Tampa — in Tampa — did y’all watch their convention?
I did. (Laughter.) In Tampa, the Republican argument against the
president’s re-election was actually pretty simple — pretty snappy. It
went something like this: We left him a total mess. He hasn’t cleaned it
up fast enough. So fire him and put us back in. (Laughter, applause.)
Now — (cheers, applause) — but they did it well. They looked good; the
sounded good. They convinced me that — (laughter) — they all love their
families and their children and were grateful they’d been born in
America and all that — (laughter, applause) — really, I’m not being —
they did. (Laughter, applause.)
And this is important, they convinced me they were honorable people who
believed what they said and they’re going to keep every commitment
they’ve made. We just got to make sure the American people know what
those commitments are — (cheers, applause) — because in order to look
like an acceptable, reasonable, moderate alternative to President Obama,
they just didn’t say very much about the ideas they’ve offered over the
last two years.
They couldn’t because they want to the same old policies that got us in
trouble in the first place. They want to cut taxes for high- income
Americans, even more than President Bush did. They want to get rid of
those pesky financial regulations designed to prevent another crash and
prohibit future bailouts. They want to actually increase defense
spending over a decade $2 trillion more than the Pentagon has requested
without saying what they’ll spend it on. And they want to make enormous
cuts in the rest of the budget, especially programs that help the middle
class and poor children.
As another president once said, there they go again.
(Laughter, cheers, applause.)
Now, I like — I like — I like the argument for President Obama’s
re-election a lot better. Here it is. He inherited a deeply damaged
economy. He put a floor under the crash. He began the long, hard road to
recovery and laid the foundation for a modern, more well- balanced
economy that will produce millions of good new jobs, vibrant new
businesses and lots of new wealth for innovators. (Cheers, applause.)
Now, are we where we want to be today? No.
AUDIENCE MEMBERS: No!
PRESIDENT CLINTON: Is the president satisfied? Of course not.
AUDIENCE MEMBERS: No!
PRESIDENT CLINTON: But are we better off than we were when he took office? (Cheers, applause.)
And listen to this. Listen to this. Everybody — (inaudible) — when
President Barack Obama took office, the economy was in free fall. It had
just shrunk 9 full percent of GDP. We were losing 750,000 jobs a month.
Are we doing better than that today?
AUDIENCE MEMBERS: Yes! (Applause.)
PRESIDENT CLINTON: The answer is yes.
Now, look. Here’s the challenge he faces and the challenge all of you
who support him face. I get it. I know it. I’ve been there. A lot of
Americans are still angry and frustrated about this economy. If you look
at the numbers, you know employment is growing, banks are beginning to
lend again. And in a lot of places, housing prices are even beginning to
pick up.
But too many people do not feel it yet.
I had the same thing happen in 1994 and early ‘95. We could see that the
policies were working, that the economy was growing. But most people
didn’t feel it yet. Thankfully, by 1996 the economy was roaring,
everybody felt it, and we were halfway through the longest peacetime
expansion in the history of the United States. But — (cheers, applause) —
wait, wait. The difference this time is purely in the circumstances.
President Obama started with a much weaker economy than I did. Listen to
me, now. No president — no president, not me, not any of my
predecessors, no one could have fully repaired all the damage that he
found in just four years. (Cheers, applause.)
Now — but — (cheers, applause) — he has — he has laid the foundation for
a new, modern, successful economy of shared prosperity. And if you will
renew the president’s contract, you will feel it. You will feel it.
(Cheers, applause.)
Folks, whether the American people believe what I just said or not may
be the whole election. I just want you to know that I believe it. With
all my heart, I believe it. (Cheers, applause.)
Now, why do I believe it?
I’m fixing to tell you why. I believe it because President Obama’s
approach embodies the values, the ideas and the direction America has to
take to build the 21st-century version of the American Dream: a nation
of shared opportunities, shared responsibilities, shared prosperity, a
shared sense of community.
So let’s get back to the story. In 2010, as the president’s recovery
program kicked in, the job losses stopped and things began to turn
around. The recovery act saved or created millions of jobs and cut taxes
— let me say this again — cut taxes for 95 percent of the American
people. (Cheers, applause.) And, in the last 29 months, our economy has
produced about 4 1/2 million private sector jobs. (Cheers, applause.)
We could have done better, but last year the Republicans blocked the
president’s job plan, costing the economy more than a million new jobs.
So here’s another job score. President Obama: plus 4 1/2 million. Congressional Republicans: zero. (Cheers, applause.)
During this period — (cheers, applause) — during this period, more than
500,000 manufacturing jobs have been created under President Obama.
That’s the first time manufacturing jobs have increased since the 1990s.
(Cheers, applause.) And I’ll tell you something else. The auto industry
restructuring worked. (Cheers, applause.) It saved — it saved more than
a million jobs, and not just at GM, Chrysler and their dealerships but
in auto parts manufacturing all over the country.
That’s why even the automakers who weren’t part of the deal supported
it. They needed to save those parts suppliers too. Like I said, we’re
all in this together. (Applause.)
So what’s happened? There are now 250,000 more people working in the
auto industry than on the day the companies were restructured. (Cheers,
applause.)
So — now, we all know that Governor Romney opposed the plan to save GM
and Chrysler. (Boos.) So here’s another job score. (Laughter.) Are you
listening in Michigan and Ohio and across the country? (Cheers.) Here —
(cheers, applause) — here’s another job score: Obama, 250,000; Romney,
zero.
AUDIENCE MEMBERS: (With speaker.) Zero. (Cheers, applause.)
PRESIDENT CLINTON: Now, the agreement the administration made with the
management, labor and environmental groups to double car mileage, that
was a good deal too. It will cut your gas prices in half, your gas bill.
No matter what the price is, if you double the mileage of your car,
your bill will be half what it would have been. It will make us more
energy independent. It will cut greenhouse gas emissions. And according
to several analyses, over the next 20 years, it’ll bring us another half
a million good new jobs into the American economy. (Cheers, applause.)
The president’s energy strategy, which he calls “all of the above,” is
helping too. The boom in oil and gas production, combined with greater
energy efficiency, has driven oil imports to a near-20- year low and
natural gas production to an all-time high. And renewable energy
production has doubled.
(Cheers, applause.)
Of course, we need a lot more new jobs. But there are already more than 3
million jobs open and unfilled in America, mostly because the people
who apply for them don’t yet have the required skills to do them. So
even as we get Americans more jobs, we have to prepare more Americans
for the new jobs that are actually going to be created. The old economy
is not coming back. We’ve got to build a new one and educate people to
do those jobs. (Cheers, applause.)
The president — the president and his education secretary have supported
community colleges and employers in working together to train people
for jobs that are actually open in their communities — and even more
important after a decade in which exploding college costs have increased
the dropout rate so much that the percentage of our young people with
four-year college degrees has gone down so much that we have dropped to
16th in the world in the percentage of young people with college
degrees.
So the president’s student loan is more important than ever. Here’s what
it does — (cheers, applause) — here’s what it does. You need to tell
every voter where you live about this. It lowers the cost of federal
student loans. And even more important, it give students the right to
repay those loans as a clear, fixed, low percentage of their income for
up to 20 years. (Cheers, applause.)
Now what does this mean? What does this mean? Think of it. It means no
one will ever have to drop out of college again for fear they can’t
repay their debt.
And it means — (cheers, applause) — it means that if someone wants to
take a job with a modest income, a teacher, a police officer, if they
want to be a small-town doctor in a little rural area, they won’t have
to turn those jobs down because they don’t pay enough to repay they
debt. Their debt obligation will be determined by their salary. This
will change the future for young America. (Cheers, applause.)
I don’t know about you — (cheers, applause) — but on all these issues, I
know we’re better off because President Obama made the decisions he
did.
Now, that brings me to health care. (Cheers, applause.) And the
Republicans call it, derisively, “Obamacare.” They say it’s a government
takeover, a disaster, and that if we’ll just elect them, they’ll repeal
it. Well, are they right?
AUDIENCE MEMBERS: No!
PRESIDENT CLINTON: Let’s take a look at what’s actually happened so far.
First, individuals and businesses have already gotten more than a
billion dollars in refunds from insurance companies because the new law
requires 80 (percent) to 85 percent of your premium to go to your health
care, not profits or promotion. (Cheers, applause.) And the gains are
even greater than that because a bunch of insurance companies have
applied to lower their rates to comply with the requirement.
Second, more than 3 million young people between 19 and 25 are insured
for the first time because their parents’ policies can cover them.
(Cheers, applause.)
Millions of seniors are receiving preventive care, all the way from
breast cancer screenings to tests for heart problems and scores of other
things. And younger people are getting them, too.
Fourth, soon the insurance companies — not the government, the insurance
companies — will have millions of new customers, many of them
middle-class people with pre-existing conditions who never could get
insurance before. (Cheers, applause.)
Now, finally, listen to this. For the last two years — after going up at
three times the rate of inflation for a decade, for the last two years
health care costs have been under 4 percent in both years for the first
time in 50 years. (Cheers, applause.)
So let me ask you something. Are we better off because President Obama
fought for health care reform? (Cheers, applause.) You bet we are.
Now, there were two other attacks on the president in Tampa I think
deserve an answer. First, both Governor Romney and Congressman Ryan
attacked the president for allegedly robbing Medicare of $716 billion.
That’s the same attack they leveled against the Congress in 2010, and
they got a lot of votes on it. But it’s not true. (Applause.)
Look, here’s what really happened. You be the judge. Here’s what really
happened. There were no cuts to benefits at all. None. What the
president did was to save money by taking the recommendations of a
commission of professionals to cut unwarranted subsidies to providers
and insurance companies that were not making people healthier and were
not necessary to get the providers to provide the service.
And instead of raiding Medicare, he used the savings to close the
doughnut hole in the Medicare drug program — (cheers, applause) — and —
you all got to listen carefully to this; this is really important — and
to add eight years to the life of the Medicare trust fund so it is
solvent till 2024. (Cheers, applause.)
So — (chuckles) — so President Obama and the Democrats didn’t weaken
Medicare; they strengthened Medicare. Now, when Congressman Ryan looked
into that TV camera and attacked President Obama’s Medicare savings as,
quote, the biggest, coldest power play, I didn’t know whether to laugh
or cry — (laughter) — because that $716 billion is exactly, to the
dollar, the same amount of Medicare savings that he has in his own
budget. (Cheers, applause.) You got to get one thing — it takes some
brass to attack a guy for doing what you did. (Laughter, cheers,
applause.)
So — (inaudible) — (sustained cheers, applause) — now, you’re having a
good time, but this is getting serious, and I want you to listen.
(Laughter.) It’s important, because a lot of people believe this stuff.
Now, at least on this issue, on this one issue, Governor Romney has been
consistent. (Laughter.) He attacked President Obama too, but he
actually wants to repeal those savings and give the money back to the
insurance company. (Laughter, boos.)
He wants to go back to the old system, which means we’ll reopen the
doughnut hole and force seniors to pay more for drugs, and we’ll reduce
the life of the Medicare trust fund by eight full years. (Boos.)
So if he’s elected, and if he does what he promised to do, Medicare will
now grow (sic/go) broke in 2016. (Boos.) Think about that. That means,
after all, we won’t have to wait until their voucher program kicks in
2023 — (laughter) — to see the end of Medicare as we know it.
(Applause.) They’re going to do it to us sooner than we thought.
(Applause.)
Now, folks, this is serious, because it gets worse. (Laughter.) And you
won’t be laughing when I finish telling you this. They also want to
block-grant Medicaid, and cut it by a third over the coming 10 years.
AUDIENCE MEMBER: No!
PRESIDENT CLINTON: Of course, that’s going to really hurt a lot of poor
kids. But that’s not all. Lot of folks don’t know it, but nearly
two-thirds of Medicaid is spent on nursing home care for Medicare
seniors — (applause) — who are eligible for Medicaid.
(Cheers, applause.) It’s going to end Medicare as we know it. And a lot
of that money is also spent to help people with disabilities, including —
(cheers, applause) — a lot of middle-class families whose kids have
Down’s syndrome or autism or other severe conditions. (Applause.) And
honestly, let’s think about it, if that happens, I don’t know what those
families are going to do.
So I know what I’m going to do. I’m going to do everything I can to see
that it doesn’t happen. We can’t let it happen. (Cheers, applause.) We
can’t. (Cheers, applause.) Now — wait a minute. (Cheers, applause.)
Let’s look —
AUDIENCE MEMBERS: Four more years! Four more years! Four more years!
PRESIDENT CLINTON: Let’s look at the other big charge the Republicans
made. It’s a real doozy. (Laughter.) They actually have charged and run
ads saying that President Obama wants to weaken the work requirements in
the welfare reform bill I signed that moved millions of people from
welfare to work. (Jeers.) Wait, you need to know, here’s what happened.
(Laughter.) Nobody ever tells you what really happened — here’s what
happened.
When some Republican governors asked if they could have waivers to try
new ways to put people on welfare back to work, the Obama administration
listened because we all know it’s hard for even people with good work
histories to get jobs today. So moving folks from welfare to work is a
real challenge.
And the administration agreed to give waivers to those governors and
others only if they had a credible plan to increase employment by 20
percent, and they could keep the waivers only if they did increase
employment. Now, did I make myself clear? The requirement was for more
work, not less. (Cheers, applause.)
So this is personal to me. We moved millions of people off welfare. It
was one of the reasons that in the eight years I was president, we had a
hundred times as many people move out of poverty into the middle class
than happened under the previous 12 years, a hundred times as many.
(Cheers, applause.) It’s a big deal. But I am telling you the claim that
President Obama weakened welfare reform’s work requirement is just not
true. (Applause.)
But they keep on running the ads claiming it. You want to know why?
Their campaign pollster said, we are not going to let our campaign be
dictated by fact-checkers. (Jeers, applause.) Now, finally I can say,
that is true. (Laughter, cheers, applause.) I — (chuckles) — I couldn’t
have said it better myself. (Laughter.)
And I hope you and every American within the sound of my voice remembers
it every time they see one of those ads, and it turns into an ad to
re-elect Barack Obama and keep the fundamental principles of personal
empowerment and moving everybody who can get a job into work as soon as
we can. (Cheers, applause.)
Now, let’s talk about the debt. Today, interest rates are low, lower
than the rate of inflation. People are practically paying us to borrow
money, to hold their money for them.
But it will become a big problem when the economy grows and interest
rates start to rise. We’ve got to deal with this big long- term debt
problem or it will deal with us. It will gobble up a bigger and bigger
percentage of the federal budget we’d rather spend on education and
health care and science and technology. It — we’ve got to deal with it.
Now, what has the president done? He has offered a reasonable plan of $4
trillion in debt reduction over a decade, with 2 1/2 trillion (dollars)
coming from — for every $2 1/2 trillion in spending cuts, he raises a
dollar in new revenues — 2 1/2-to-1. And he has tight controls on future
spending. That’s the kind of balanced approach proposed by the
Simpson-Bowles Commission, a bipartisan commission.
Now, I think this plan is way better than Governor Romney’s plan. First,
the Romney plan failed the first test of fiscal responsibility. The
numbers just don’t add up. (Laughter, applause.)
I mean, consider this. What would you do if you had this problem?
Somebody says, oh, we’ve got a big debt problem. We’ve got to reduce the
debt. So what’s the first thing you say we’re going to do? Well, to
reduce the debt, we’re going to have another $5 trillion in tax cuts
heavily weighted to upper-income people. So we’ll make the debt hole
bigger before we start to get out of it.
Now, when you say, what are you going to do about this $5 trillion you
just added on? They say, oh, we’ll make it up by eliminating loopholes
in the tax code.
So then you ask, well, which loopholes, and how much?
You know what they say? See me about that after the election. (Laughter.)
I’m not making it up. That’s their position. See me about that after the election.
Now, people ask me all the time how we got four surplus budgets in a
row. What new ideas did we bring to Washington? I always give a one-word
answer: Arithmetic. (Sustained cheers, applause.)
If — arithmetic! If — (applause) — if they stay with their $5 trillion
tax cut plan — in a debt reduction plan? — the arithmetic tells us, no
matter what they say, one of three things is about to happen. One,
assuming they try to do what they say they’ll do, get rid of — pay —
cover it by deductions, cutting those deductions, one, they’ll have to
eliminate so many deductions, like the ones for home mortgages and
charitable giving, that middle-class families will see their tax bills
go up an average of $2,000 while anybody who makes $3 million or more
will see their tax bill go down $250,000. (Boos.)
Or, two, they’ll have to cut so much spending that they’ll obliterate
the budget for the national parks, for ensuring clean air, clean water,
safe food, safe air travel. They’ll cut way back on Pell Grants, college
loans, early childhood education, child nutrition programs, all the
programs that help to empower middle-class families and help poor kids.
Oh, they’ll cut back on investments in roads and bridges and science and
technology and biomedical research.
That’s what they’ll do. They’ll hurt the middle class and the poor and
put the future on hold to give tax cuts to upper-income people who’ve
been getting it all along.
Or three, in spite of all the rhetoric, they’ll just do what they’ve
been doing for more than 30 years. They’ll go in and cut the taxes way
more than they cut spending, especially with that big defense increase,
and they’ll just explode the debt and weaken the economy. And they’ll
destroy the federal government’s ability to help you by letting interest
gobble up all your tax payments.
Don’t you ever forget when you hear them talking about this that
Republican economic policies quadrupled the national debt before I took
office, in the 12 years before I took office — (applause) — and doubled
the debt in the eight years after I left, because it defied arithmetic.
(Laughter, applause.) It was a highly inconvenient thing for them in our
debates that I was just a country boy from Arkansas, and I came from a
place where people still thought two and two was four. (Laughter,
applause.) It’s arithmetic.
We simply cannot afford to give the reins of government to someone who
will double down on trickle down. (Cheers, applause.) Really. Think
about this: President Obama — President Obama’s plan cuts the debt,
honors our values, brightens the future of our children, our families
and our nation. It’s a heck of a lot better.
It passes the arithmetic test, and far more important, it passes the values test. (Cheers, applause.)
My fellow Americans, all of us in this grand hall and everybody watching
at home, when we vote in this election, we’ll be deciding what kind of
country we want to live in. If you want a winner-take- all,
you’re-on-your-own society, you should support the Republican ticket.
But if you want a country of shared opportunities and shared
responsibility, a we’re-all-in-this-together society, you should vote
for Barack Obama and Joe Biden. (Cheers, applause.) If you — if you want
—
AUDIENCE MEMBERS: (Chanting.) Four more years! Four more years!
PRESIDENT CLINTON: If you want America — if you want every American to
vote and you think it is wrong to change voting procedures — (jeers) —
just to reduce the turnout of younger, poorer, minority and disabled
voters — (jeers) — you should support Barack Obama. (Cheers, applause.)
And if you think — if you think the president was right to open the
doors of American opportunity to all those young immigrants brought here
when they were young so they can serve in the military or go to
college, you must vote for Barack Obama. (Cheers, applause.) If you want
a future of shared prosperity, where the middle class is growing and
poverty is declining, where the American dream is really alive and well
again and where the United States maintains its leadership as a force
for peace and justice and prosperity in this highly competitive world,
you have to vote for Barack Obama.
(Cheers, applause.)
Look, I love our country so much. And I know we’re coming back. For more
than 200 years, through every crisis, we’ve always come back. (Cheers.)
People have predicted our demise ever since George Washington was
criticized for being a mediocre surveyor with a bad set of wooden false
teeth. (Laughter.) And so far, every single person that’s bet against
America has lost money because we always come back. (Cheers, applause.)
We come through ever fire a little stronger and a little better.
And we do it because in the end we decide to champion the cause for
which our founders pledged their lives, their fortunes, their sacred
honor — the cause of forming a more perfect union. (Cheers, applause.)
My fellow Americans, if that is what you want, if that is what you
believe, you must vote and you must re-elect President Barack Obama.
(Cheers, applause.) God bless you and God bless America. (Cheers,
applause.)
END
No comments:
Post a Comment